Translate

Showing posts with label Boston Non-Importation Agreement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Boston Non-Importation Agreement. Show all posts

Thursday, April 25, 2019

A Revolutionary War Martyr


A cousin to my sons, Samuel Swift (1715-1775), was a member of the Sons of Liberty and called a “martyr for freedom’s cause” by his friend, Samuel Adams (1722-1803). Samuel Swift was married twice, but at the period of time we’re interested in, he was married to his second wife, Ann Foster (1729-1788), with whom he had six children.
Swift died under British house arrest in Boston, Massachusetts, having contracted an illness from which he did not recover. I suspect it may have been smallpox or diphtheria as these were two prevalent diseases during the Revolutionary War and decimated General Washington’s troops.
Let’s backtrack from Swift’s death to the events leading up to his house arrest. His good friend, Samuel Adams, was the founder of the Sons of Liberty. The Sons of Liberty, was founded in 1765 in Boston and dissolved in 1776. It was a secret organization organized in all thirteen colonies to advance the rights of the colonists and to fight taxation by the British government. It played a major role in battling the Stamp Act and applying pressure to merchants who did not comply with the non-importation associations (see prior blog). Wherever these groups existed, they were directed in secret by leading men – Samuel Swift was one of these men. 

Image from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 Additionally, Swift was part of Boston’s Committee of Correspondence. Each major city had one of these committees whose purpose was to maintain contact between colonial cities. The defined purpose of Boston’s Committee was to “Prepare a statement of the rights of colonists, and of this province in particular, as men, as Christians, and as subjects; Prepare a declaration of the infringement of those rights; and Prepare a letter to be sent to all towns in this province (Massachusetts) and to the world, giving the sense of this town.” In 1773, this Committee was charged with managing the “tea crisis” and was the driving force behind the Boston Tea Party. Samuel Swift – not an actual member of the Boston Tea Party - is alleged to have been one of the managers of the Boston Tea Party. 1 Though the Committees of Correspondence were primarily concerned with diplomacy, the Sons of Liberty were more about action. So, it was probably the Sons of Liberty members (who were also members of the Committees of Correspondence) who pulled off the Boston Tea Party. 
Google Image
 Samuel Swift was known for his zeal regarding the revolution, and Samuel Adams said that “Samuel Swift caused Bostonians to secrete their arms when the British Governor, Gage, offered the town freedom if arms were brought into the arsenal.”  Additionally, in 1775, Swift was the presiding officer at a Freemasons meeting where it was agreed to use the concealed arms and, if needed, pitchforks and axes, to attack the British soldiers stationed in Boston. About June 1775, Gov. Gage got wind of this scheme and imprisoned Samuel Swift. 2
Swift’s willingness to resort to violence is seen in a letter he wrote to Samuel Adams on October 24, 1774: “As for my part I am no Swordsman but with Gun or flail I fear no man more especially my Cause being Good as I think otherwise [sic] I would not engage.” 3 
Needless to say, Swift’s wife, Ann, was distraught about her husband’s house arrest. She and their children were forced to leave their home and went to live in Springfield, Massachusetts, about 90 miles west of Boston. Ann was an inveterate diary keeper.  She writes in her diary in June 1775: “Here I am in the woods, Boston being so surrounded by armies that we could not enjoy our home: no school for the children, and the town forsaken by the ministers—the pillars of the land.” At the same time, she wrote a letter to a British officer, Captain Handfield, asking that her husband be able to come to her:
“Capt. Handfield, Sir,

            Your kindness in undertaking to me a pass for me emboldens me to ask the like favor for my dear husband whom I hear is in a very weak state of health. The anxiety of my mind is great about him. A word from you would have more weight than all the arguments that he could make use of.
            Could I come to him, this favor I would not ask. I, Sir I trust in your goodness that you will do what you can to forward Mr. Swift to me and in doing so you will greatly oblige

            Your distressed friend                        ANN SWIFT

Should be glad if he would bring out two
trunks which there is clothing in that I
want very much for myself and children.” 4

Despite his wife’s plea, Samuel Swift was not released to go to Springfield. I presume that despite his illness, Governor Gage, deemed him a threat, sick or not.  Samuel Swift died on August 30, 1775. His wife wrote in her diary: “Departed this life, in the 61st year of his age, my dear husband, Samuel Swift. He died in Boston, or in other words, murdered there. He was not allowed to come to see me and live with his wife and children in the country. There he gave up the ghost—his heart was broken; the cruel treatment he met with in being a friend to his country was more than he could bear. With six fatherless children (in the woods) and all my substance in Boston.” 5 

Both Ann Foster Swift and Samuel Adams were correct – Samuel Swift, a true Revolutionary, gave his life for his country, dying a martyr. 
 
Image from Find a Grave
Samuel Swift is my sons’ second cousin, nine times removed.

1 - "Committees of Correspondence: The Voice of the Patriots." Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum, 5 Mar 2019, www.bostonteapartyship.com/committees-of-correspondence.
2 - Ibid.
3 - "To John Adams from Samuel Swift, 20 October 1774," Founders Online, National Archives, last modified June 13, 2018, http://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/06-02-0059. [Original source: The Adams Papers, Papers of John Adams, vol. 2, December 1773-April 1775, ed. Robert J. Taylor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977, pp. 192-196.
4 - "North America, Family Histories, 1500-2000." Ancestry.com. Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2016. www.ancestry.com. Memoirs of Gen. Joseph Gardner Swift, LL D, USA : First graduate of the United States Military Academy.
5 - Ibid.
 

Wednesday, January 23, 2019

Patriot Smuggler


 It’s August 24, 1770, and Nathaniel Cary (1727-1797) has just been fined, along with four other men, for being a smuggler by the Boston Committee of Inspection. Nathaniel was born in Boston, Massachusetts, and presumably lived out his life in the Boston area. He died on Nantucket Island, which is off the coast of Cape Cod.



Cary came from a line of merchants, traders, and sea captains. It is not known what he was smuggling, or if he was working in collusion with other gentlemen; however, his activity does take place before the Boston Tea Party of 1773. To deduce what type of activity Cary was involved in, it’s necessary to go back to 1768.

On August 1, 1768, Boston merchants entered into an agreement entitled the “Boston Non-Importation Agreement.” With this agreement, merchants and tradesmen agreed not to import goods from Britain or to export goods to Britain. And though this was not the first step of rebellion against British rule, it was just one of many. This agreement boycotted goods being taxed by Britain:  lead, glass, linen and other high-quality cloth, oil, paint, paper, and tea – just to name a few. The goods being taxed were goods the Colonies themselves did not produced or make.

It was very tempting for Colonists to turn to smuggling:  It was a way to obtain wanted goods, but also undermine British regulations.

The Boston Chronicle newspaper constantly published names of those who were caught “importing”
forbidden goods, the names of their business, and the ships on which the goods arrived. An admonition was also published to not patronize the accused smugglers.

So, back to Nathaniel. As he was fined for disobeying the non-importation agreement, it can be safely assumed he was a merchant. And as a merchant, he would try to serve his clientele in providing them  goods not easily obtained. Yes, he worked outside of the local law; but, in the plus column, he was not a Loyalist who defected to Canada or to England at the time of the Revolution.

Nathaniel Cary is not one of the known members of the Boston Tea Party in 1773. But as he was a native Bostonian, perhaps he gave he them assistance in some way.

So, can a smuggler also be a patriot? I believe so.

Nathaniel Cary is my sons 3rd cousin 8x removed.

Image from Findagrave.com


Note: Unless otherwise noted, all images are from Google.com